2/18/2023 0 Comments Ai remix topaz studio 2![]() ![]() I am just starting to learn to use this app. For image storage I use a local hard drive as my primary storage and for backup on the web I use SmugMug for edited, selected files and I use Google Drive synced to my local hard drive for generic cloud based backup storage. I only use Photoshop if I'm trying to do something relatively fancy, which, in my case, is not very often. I think Classic LR is pretty hard to beat for basic cataloging and editing of images. If you have the Photo subscription for Creative Cloud, it includes Classic LR, "new" LR, and Photoshop, so you are already paying for Classic LR and you could try it out without incurring any additional expense. And I imagine that they are pretty smart. But if Adobe is smart, they will have made this interaction seamless. I don't have any experience with this and can't tell you how well it works and/or if it is easy to do or not. I don't use the "new" version of LR for photo storage in the cloud, but the Classic Version of LR can be set up to sync photos with the "new" version automatically, which I assume means that they can be set up to work together so you can edit photos in the Classic version and store them via the "new" version without doing anything too complex. Yes, the new version is just a photo manager, not an editor.ĬC stands for "Creative Cloud", which is just the blanket term Adobe uses for all of their subscription based, delivered over the web products including both versions of Lightroom, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc. In the new version there's no way to add in an external editor. This version stores your photos in the Adobe cloud (not sure if that's possible in Classic, but I'd be more inclined to learn Classic if I could do that). I don't use "classic", I just use the "new" version (which I think is either called "CC", or when you do "About", says Version 3). In other words, is there a logic that I can apply in advance to make the choice or is it necessary to just try them both and see which does a better job? When one might be better to use than the other. What I am asking is, how are they different? I can't find any information on the Topaz web site (or anywhere else) that describes how these algorithms work and how they are different from each other. When you open the current version of DeNoise AI, you are given a choice in a drop down menu as to which algorithm you wish to use for noise reduction: DeNoise AI or Clear AI. It has been incorporated into DeNoise AI. ![]() It's true that DeNoise AI replaced DeNoise, but Clear AI still exists. Is there a publicly stated difference in operation for each of these algorithms which would allow one to choose between them in advance, or is picking one over the other more a matter of trial and error?ĭenoise AI replaces both Clear AI and Denoise (the non AI version) if my understanding of this web page from TopazLabs is correct (allows upgrade from those 2 SW to Denoise AI)ĭenoise AI replaces both Clear AI and Denoise (the non AI version) if my understanding of this web page from TopazLabs is correct (allows upgrade from those 2 SW to Denoise AI). ![]() Any thoughts on use of Topaz DeNoise AI?Ĭan anyone explain how Clear AI differs from DeNoise AI? It's not obvious to me which of these options to use when. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |